U.S. Politics' Journal|
[Most Recent Entries]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in
U.S. Politics' LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 ]
[ << Previous 20 ]
|Sunday, March 21st, 2010|
Hi!! :) I hope this is ok to advertise , I have a political raiting community I made politicalstamps
please join!! :) (Delete this if its not allowed) Current Mood: cheerful
|Friday, July 24th, 2009|
Sanford, et al.
Friend sent me this awhile ago and I just got around to reading it. I like the eye of the needle analogy. From The Nation.
( ArticleCollapse )
|Saturday, November 8th, 2008|
Saw this on someone else's journal and I have to agree with her, it's the best election night video out there. Not the biggest crowd but damn, it made me tear up a little.
|Tuesday, November 4th, 2008|
PLEASE GO VOTE!
in this country, you have a right
to vote, so please, please take advantage of it. youve been hearing crap from both sides saying "vote for obama!" "vote for mccain!" "vote for nader!" "vote for mickey mouse!" "VOTE FOR WHOEVER!" but its time to take action and go do it! regardless of who you vote for, just go vote; your opinion matters but it will never
count if you dont go vote!
I live in a small suburb of Detroit, about 12 miles north of the border. I was in line 15 minutes before opening at 7:00 AM and was about the 25th in line. Once they opened it took 28 minutes until I walked out the door. It took my brother, in another city, 45 minutes once they opened.
When I left the line was wrapping around the building.
Spoke to a woman at work who lives in Detroit proper. She drove by the voting office at 5:15 AM on her way in and the line was already snaking around the building.
Cross-posted to my personal journal
|Wednesday, October 15th, 2008|
|Tuesday, October 7th, 2008|
|Sunday, October 5th, 2008|
Hey, I have spent almost all day looking for the precinct voting results for Ohio, Colorado, Maine, and New Mexico. However, I cannot find the results anywhere. Can someone please point me in the right direction?
|Saturday, October 4th, 2008|
So the man who said he was going to change the face of politics by running an honorable campaign has now decided to run all-negative-all-the-time until the end of the election. Why am I not surprised. This is the same man that in one campaign said the religious fundamentalists had too much power and in the next campaign dropped to his knees for them.
He and his latter day swift boaters, the Freedom Defense Fund, have lost all self respect.
It saddens me because at one time I truly admired him.
|Friday, October 3rd, 2008|
I guess I agree with most people, Joe Biden and Sarah Palin both did what they set out to do. Palin proved that (thanks to the Katie Couric interviews) that she wasn't a total air head and Joe Biden attacked McCain well. Win-Win for both, with Biden coming out on top.
I watched the debate on my computer at CNN. I didn't want to see the male/female line they had on tv, I wanted to see what the Independents felt. Biden led far more with the positive line than Palin did.
I thought Biden did well and was truly touched when he spoke about being a single parent. I also got a huge kick with his response on what the Vice President's duties were. His score line almost went off the chart with that one.
Palin did well but I found myself getting irked the longer she spoke and it took me a bit before I found out why. I don't want a "folksy" VP, I want one that demands respect from foreign heads of state. I also hatehatehated when she winked. WTF was that? How in the world would we NOT be laughed at because she was being all flirty?
Honest to goodness, the GOP could have picked many, many other women to run in the VP spot that would have been heads above this woman. As a woman who was an MP in the army, put myself through college while working full time to support my two daughters and who fought to get to where I am, she just pisses me off.
And in other news, John McCain has pulled his Michigan campaign. Is he crazy?
|Tuesday, September 30th, 2008|
|Sunday, September 28th, 2008|
|Saturday, September 27th, 2008|
Last Nights Debate
Being objective as much as I can.
I think McCain did fine. He made a few good jabs on foreign policy to show he wasn't out yet. On the economy he didn't do as well. He's still haunted by his "fundamentally sound" comment and Obama used it to his advantage.
The thing is, this was said to be McCain's debate since Foreign Policy is, supposedly, his strong point. By just doing fine, he kind of came out weaker. Am I making any sense?
Obama just had to be Presidential and he was that in spades. He was poised and never seemed to go off track. From what the feed on CNN said, the Independents seemed to like Obama more, especially when he spoke about gaining America's reputation back and his environmental goals.
He did make a couple of flubs, I actually liked the "I have a bracelet too" comment because it blocked McCain's hit on that. He didn't know the soldier's name right off though and that wasn't good. You can make all kinds of excuses, including nerves or pressure, but it was still a flub.
|Friday, September 26th, 2008|
After watching the Republicans at work on this banking crisis...
...I understand why people jumped off buildings during the Great Depression. I'd rather jump off a building than listen to any more of their crap, too. Ye gods, what a bunch of amoral assholes. Not that I necessarily think the bail-out plan is a good one. I just think the Repubs couldn't care less about real people and how all this malfeasance by what is the real
base of the Republican party has destroyed people's lives.
In other news, Obama is up a little in the polls, and it pisses. me. off. If he was white, he'd already have this election signed, sealed, and delivered. It just makes me ill. Current Mood: aggravated
|Wednesday, September 24th, 2008|
John McCain wants to delay Friday's debate to focus on the economic crises. Now I've seen both pro's and con's on this decision. I've read that it's a smart move because it shows he's putting "Country First" and I've read that he's actually running scared because his "Fundamentally Strong" comments will most likely be brought up in the debate, and with him trailing so far in the polls he wants things to be settled first.
I'm actually thinking it's a bit of both, but actually more of a grandstanding move. I think he's so far out of touch with the economy that he really doesn't grasp what's going on. He has a real ability to separate what he says with the facts, like his denying that his supporter Carly Fiorina is part of the golden parachute crowd.
The real question is Obama, will he risk acting like he doesn't care and demand the debate or will he look like a "follower" and not a leader by following McCain to Washington.
|Saturday, August 30th, 2008|
Well, well, well.
Obama's speech was amazing. I thought the speech was surprisingly strong and he lived up to the expectations. It's about time a Democrat got some cajones and went on the attack.
I was small, about 4 or 5, when I first became aware of racism. My grandmother took me to the local drug store in Detroit and I went to the candy counter and asked for some "Ni**er Toes", which were the chocolate covered vanilla drop candies. She shushed me because there was a black man at the counter. The thing is, this is what I'd always heard them called. The year? 1959 or 1960. All of a sudden I realized that my family said "bad things" and that ni**ers were the recipients of those bad things. I promised myself I wouldn't be like that and I've tried, usually successfully, to achieve that.
Putting that memory along side the speech was amazing to me. I remember racism being the norm not some dirty little secret like it is today. It was boldly spoken not whispered with a little self-depreciating laugh. My grandparents, and others, might not have used that word
in public but the laws were in place to back up that attitude.
Thursday night Barack Obama, win or lose, changed the face of race in this country.
Then on Friday afternoon John McCain pulled a major coup. He knocked Barack Obama off of the front page with the nomination of Sarah Palin.
Now, I can't help but feel that he's going for the PUMA's and Independents, but I don't think Palin will do that. She might make the Social Conservatives more comfortable, they were in a tizzy that he might pick his butt-monkey (tm Joss Whedon) Joe Lieberman, that a true conservative choice made them overjoyed. It was acknowledging their importance.
As far as the PUMA's, I think they are overblown. In the beginning they might have been all about Clinton, but I think there has been a huge influx of GOP's to shore up the numbers and try and spread the seeds of discontent. A woman that believed in Hillary's importance, and her stand on woman's issues, isn't going to go belly up just because a woman is running.
The few that would vote for a woman over women's issues are like the Ron Paul crowd. They are so caught up in the frenzy, that their loudness makes them seem larger than they really are.
This elections is about the issues. It's about the Supreme Court and the economy. The GOP and Democrats are coming at it from opposite ends so a Sarah Palin isn't going to change any true progressive's mind.